Peer Review Process
The image outlines a detailed workflow for participating in a conference and the subsequent peer review and publication process for papers in conference. It is divided into two main sections: the Conference Process and the Publication Process.
The **Conference Process** begins with registration, distinguishing between participants and presenters. Participants follow a straightforward path involving payment, submission of proof, and receiving necessary documents to attend the conference. Presenters, on the other hand, download templates, submit full papers, and undergo an acceptance review. If accepted, they attend the conference and prepare their papers for further review.
The **Publication Process** starts after the conference, focusing on the peer review of submitted papers. Papers are reviewed by referees and checked for similarity. Authors may need to revise their papers based on feedback before resubmitting them. The revised papers undergo a final decision process. Accepted papers are then checked and prepared for submission to the publisher, eventually leading to publication in a Scopus-indexed proceedings conference.